The Milk Movie and Democracy
We
can examine artistic works not only as an aesthetic dimension but also as a
source that shows political and social structures. The movie Harvey, directed
by Gus Van Sant in 2008, also tried to reflect the period politically and
socially and to show us various thoughts. In this article, I will examine what
kind of messages the movie Milk gives us in the political and social context,
especially from more specific perspectives such as democracy and human rights. I
will discuss the political and social reflection of the film, its positive and
negative aspects, and the messages it gives us.
Milk is a biographical film directed by Gus
Van Sant in 2008. The
film deals with the political life and era of politician Harvey Milk in the
1970s. The
subject of the movie is Harvey Milk, the first politician to be elected to the
California State Legislature without hiding his sexual orientation. Harvey, who lives
in New York and is approaching 40 years old, lived his life in the closet in
his own words. He
decides to move to San Francisco with boyfriend Scott. He will start a new
life in San Francisco and stop hiding his sexual identity. He and her
boyfriend Scott open a shop selling photography and camera parts on Castro
Street. But
not all of his neighbors in the neighborhood are happy about it. This is important
to Harvey because little by little he will begin to organize. He is disturbed
because he is exposed to discrimination based on sexual orientation here. Together
with Allan Baird, Head of the Teamsters Union, they held a beer protest.
This protest
was successful and sales declined. However, the teamsters union has started to
recruit gay drivers. Harvey saw that it was possible to get his rights by
organizing here. However,
increasing police violence against LGBT individuals at that time affected
Harvey. One
day, he saw the death of a friend and blames the police for it. The street they
live in has almost become a gathering place for LGBT individuals. As Harvey saw
the crowds, he became aware of his powers and began to give speeches to the
people. With his famous phrase 'My name is Harvey Milk and I'm here to recruit
you', he started to become the masses. In
1973 he ran for the San Francisco Supervisory Board. He loses this election
because he is a novice and financially incompetent. But without losing hope, he
begins to prepare for the next election. He
narrowly lost the next election, but he did not give up hope. He won the
election after losing 3 times in 1977 and became the city supervisor. This has been a great nationwide event and has given hope
to many people. During his tenure, he supported those who
suffered discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and other victim
groups. 11 months after he took office, he was killed
by an inspector like himself, Dan White. The movie
Milk has remarkably emphasized that we must fight for our rights ourselves. The
sentence 'rights are not given, taken' reflects Harvey's life. It has been
stated that if we are not equal in the political sense, no equality will yield
results. However, the relationship between human
rights and democracy has been emphasized impressively. In addition to these, one of the important theses of the
movie is to show how prejudiced and ignorant sexual orientation-based hate
crimes are.
The movie Milk also has a documentary quality
as it adds old recordings in some scenes. Therefore, it also reflects the political
and legal structure of the period. The United States was a country that could
be called democratic, although that period had some aspects of it that were
undemocratic. In
this respect, the film also emphasized the positive aspects of political life.
For example,
freedom of assembly and freedom of expression for their rights is a notable scene in the movie.
Milk was able to introduce himself by explaining his ideas to people. This is an event
that can happen thanks to democratic systems. Although Harvey's freedom to work
economically was restricted due to his sexual orientation in the early days, he
was able to obtain these rights thanks to his political basic freedoms. The necessary
condition and necessary tool of democracy is political democracy

In addition to
the above-mentioned positive aspects, the film strikingly revealed its
political and legal negative aspects. For
example, Milk received many times death threats. In
the first scenes of the movie, Scott wants to go to the police in the face of the
death threat on paper, but Harvey prevents it because he does not trust the
cops. He has seen that the police do not care much
about LGBT individuals and they also use very harsh violence against LGBT
individuals. This is a major violation of human rights,
both politically and legally. Another similar
example was experienced by John Briggs, whom they against in the 'proposition
6' vote. Briggs threatened Harvey with assault and
death. This is democratically unacceptable. And it is democratically disturbing that he can freely
say this without any sanction. A free and fair
environment is needed for democracy to function well. While conflicts or differences of opinion are normal in
democracies, a hostile threat is not. For this, agnostic politics is important, not antagonistic politics. In addition, Milk's murder as a result of a hate crime
and White's very light sentence is a big negative in terms of law. Showing them
to the audience at the end of the movie is an important document in terms of
human rights violations for that period.
There are many factors that feed these negatives. The main source of these negatives is the gaps in the political and legal system. The pressure and ideological apparatus of the state feeds these negativities. The police, a
repressive apparatus, worked to suppress the voices of these people. Although this is a difficult situation in terms of
democracy, the indifferent attitude of the police towards hate crimes feeds
them. The film also shows that homosexual
individuals are discriminated against through ideological apparatus such as the
family and the church. It is strikingly stated throughout the film
that Briggs harshly excludes these people in the name of protecting family
values. Similarly, the interviews Anita Bryant gave
at the church are important. Through institutions such as the family and the
church, these people were sought to be excluded from the political, social and
economic sphere. However, the punishment given to White is also an incentive
for such crimes. Individuals organized demonstrations and made
their voices heard in the face of these negativities. For Harvey, the effort to show their existence and obtain
their rights rather than election is remarkable throughout the film. However, he appeared in front of the media with Briggs
for the 'proposition 6' vote. This is important to
the public, that is, they have actively worked to get the rights. In the face
of these negativities, the structure of the characters in the film is important.
Milk was more radical than the people around him. According to him, if Asians
have Asian representatives and Blacks have Black representatives, gays need a
gay representative. For this reason, it is stated in the movie that Milk also
wants a radical democracy rather than liberal democracy. However, the silence
of LGBT individuals who were wealthy and powerful at that time bothers Harvey.
Unfortunately, it cannot be denied that this is a fact that still persists
today.
Despite
everything, Milk's active politics also sheds light on us for a better
political system. Having a broad spectrum of democracy is
important for protecting human rights. It showed
that democracy can exist together with differences. However, it has been shown that the most important
equality is political equality, so that others can also be achieved. Although conflict and differences are normal for
democracy, it is shown throughout the movie that it can be achieved by
communicating with people, not hostile.
As a result, the
film has shown us the structure of the period in a striking way. The film partly has a documentary character from time to
time, it was able to convey the political and social situation of the period to
us. It is gratifying for us that the movie shows
the positive aspects as well as the negative aspects. As hope is important for our lives, it is one of the most
beautiful messages that hope is important in our democracies.
References
Dahl, R. A. (2021). Neden Demokrasi? Demokrasi
Üzerine (s. 63). içinde Ankara: Phoenix.
Dahl, R. A. (2021). Neden
Demokrasi? Demokrasi Üzerine (s. 64). içinde Ankara: Phoenix.
Sartori, G. (2014). G.
Sartori içinde, Demokrasi Teorisine Geri Dönüş (s. 28). Bursa: Sentez.



Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder